I. Executive Summary: A Turning Point for Kenya-Iran Tea Trade

The agreement reached on August 12, 2025, between the governments of Kenya and Iran to establish a joint committee marks a pivotal moment for the Kenyan tea sector. This diplomatic breakthrough, aimed at lifting the recent ban on Kenyan tea exports to Iran within a 60-day timeframe, presents both a significant opportunity for market recovery and a critical juncture for reinforcing the principles of quality, integrity, and trust in the global tea trade. The suspension of trade, precipitated by a damaging case of fraudulent trade malpractice, underscored the vulnerabilities inherent in the supply chain and the profound reputational risks associated with lapses in quality control.  

The core of the issue stems from the discovery that a Kenyan-registered firm, Cup of Joe Limited, was engaged in a scheme of importing low-grade tea, blending it, and re-exporting it to Iran under the guise of premium Kenyan tea. This act of adulteration triggered a diplomatic fallout and the subsequent embargo, halting trade with one of Kenya’s most valuable and rapidly growing tea markets. The resolution, forged during the 7th Session of the Kenya–Iran Joint Commission for Cooperation (JCC), mandates the creation of a new, more robust regulatory framework designed to restore confidence and prevent the recurrence of such malpractice.  

This commentary finds that while the reopening of the Iranian market offers a substantial opportunity to reclaim millions of dollars in export revenue and stabilize prices at the Mombasa Tea Auction, this potential is conditional. The path forward is predicated on the successful implementation of stringent, verifiable quality assurance protocols that must permeate the entire Kenyan tea value chain. The incident has moved the goalposts for compliance; what was once implicit trust must now be replaced by explicit, demonstrable proof of quality and origin. Furthermore, persistent geopolitical risks, most notably the impact of U.S. sanctions on international financial transactions with Iran, remain a formidable headwind that will require sophisticated navigation by exporters.

As a licensed tea brokerage firm grounded in the Kenyan tea industry and connected globally, Atlas Tea Brokers is uniquely positioned to guide its clients through this complex and evolving landscape. Our deep market intelligence, unwavering commitment to transparent valuation, and rigorous quality assessment services provide the necessary tools to mitigate risk and capitalize on the opportunities presented by this new chapter in Kenya-Iran trade relations. This analysis serves to equip our partners with the strategic foresight required to operate successfully in a market that will be defined by higher standards and greater scrutiny, but also by the potential for significant reward.  

II. A Market Disrupted: The Context and Cost of the Iran Export Ban

Sub-section 2.1: The Value of a Key Partner: Iran’s Strategic Importance to Kenyan Tea

Iran has long been more than just another export destination for Kenyan tea; it represents a strategic, high-value market with significant growth potential. The trade relationship, though subject to geopolitical volatility, has demonstrated a strong upward trajectory, underscoring the magnitude of the loss incurred during the recent ban. Historically, Iran has consistently ranked among the top ten importers of Kenyan tea, with its importance growing in recent years.  

The economic data illustrates a market in rapid expansion. Between 2020 and 2024, export volumes surged from 3.2 million kilograms to a record high of 13 million kilograms. This dramatic increase in volume was mirrored in value, which escalated from approximately USD 5 million (KSh 645 million) in 2020 to USD 33 million (KSh 4.25 billion) in 2024. Even with a slight downturn in 2023, where exports registered 12.4 million kilograms valued at KSh 4.28 billion (USD 44.78 million), the figures confirmed Iran’s status as a multi-billion shilling market for Kenya. Projections made before major disruptions suggested that, with normalized trade relations, Kenyan tea exports to Iran could realistically climb to 20,000 metric tons, positioning it as a top-five global market for Kenya.  

This strategic value is rooted in the Iranian market’s specific preferences. Iranian consumers have a discerning palate and a known preference for high-quality black teas, a segment where Kenya excels. The market has historically sought out premium Kenyan grades, including both Crush, Tear, Curl (CTC) and, increasingly, orthodox varieties, and has been willing to pay good prices for them. Kenyan tea is widely regarded in Iran as being of a higher grade than competing teas from India and Sri Lanka, a perception that provides a significant competitive advantage. This preference for superior quality is precisely what made the subsequent adulteration scandal so profoundly damaging, as it struck at the very heart of the trade relationship: trust in the “Brand Kenya” promise of excellence.  

YearExport Volume (Million Kgs)Export Value (USD Million)Export Value (KSh Billion)
20203.25.00.65
202217.8~50.15.90
202312.444.84.28
202413.033.04.25

Table 1: Kenya Tea Exports to Iran (2020-2024): A Market on the Rise, Abruptly Halted. Data compiled from multiple sources to illustrate the market’s growth and value prior to the full suspension.  

Sub-section 2.2: Anatomy of a Crisis: The “Cup of Joe” Scandal and its Fallout

The suspension of tea exports was not the result of a minor quality issue but a calculated act of commercial fraud that undermined the integrity of the entire Kenyan tea brand. The crisis centered on the actions of a Kenyan-registered firm, “Cup of Joe Limited,” which was found to be engaged in a sophisticated scheme of tea adulteration. Investigations revealed that the company was importing low-grade tea from third countries, including Vietnam and even Iran itself, into Kenya. This inferior product was then blended and repackaged before being fraudulently re-exported to Iran, deceptively labeled as high-grade, premium Kenyan tea.  

This malpractice represents a severe form of product adulteration, a persistent threat in the global food and beverage industry. Common methods of tea adulteration can range from the crude addition of bulking agents like sand, sawdust, or chalk to more deceptive techniques such as dyeing leaves with artificial colorants (e.g., Prussian blue, coal tar dyes) or mixing in exhausted, previously used tea leaves to increase volume. The “Cup of Joe” scheme was particularly egregious because it leveraged Kenya’s strong reputation to pass off an inferior, blended product as authentic. The complexity of this operation—involving international sourcing, importation, customs clearance, warehousing, blending, and re-exportation—points toward a significant operational capability and suggests a potential exploitation of systemic loopholes in regulatory and logistical oversight, rather than the isolated actions of a single rogue entity.  

The fallout was immediate and severe. The discovery of the fraud triggered a major diplomatic dispute between Nairobi and Tehran, culminating in Iran’s decision to impose a complete ban on Kenyan tea imports. The reputational damage to “Brand Kenya” was immense. For decades, Kenya has cultivated a global identity synonymous with high-quality, authentic tea. This single incident threatened to erode that hard-won trust, casting doubt on the integrity of the entire supply chain. The Kenyan government’s firm response—which included the immediate deregistration of Cup of Joe Limited by the Tea Board of Kenya and the initiation of criminal prosecution—was a necessary step to signal the gravity of the offense and begin the process of rebuilding confidence. However, the core challenge remains: restoring the trust that was so carelessly broken.  

A deeper analysis suggests that market dynamics may have inadvertently contributed to creating an environment where such fraud could be seen as profitable. Prior to the ban, Iran had imposed a price cap that valued Kenyan tea at approximately $2 per kilogram, significantly lower than the $4.5 per kilogram cap for teas from India and Sri Lanka. This created a commercial paradox: a market that desired the premium quality of Kenyan tea but was unwilling to pay a commensurate price. This price disparity could have created a powerful incentive for an unscrupulous trader to engineer a lower-cost product that mimicked the appearance of high-grade Kenyan tea, thereby allowing them to profit within the constraints of the price cap. A sustainable resolution, therefore, must not only enforce quality standards but also address the underlying economic structures to ensure that fair value is paid for genuine premium products, thus removing the incentive for adulteration.  

Sub-section 2.3: Quantifying the Embargo’s Toll: Economic Impact Assessment

The imposition of the export ban dealt a direct and significant economic blow to Kenya’s agriculture sector. Government officials and industry bodies characterized the embargo as having caused “significant losses” and “heavy financial blows” to the nation’s tea farmers and exporters, who suddenly lost access to a market worth over KSh 4.2 billion (approximately USD 33 million) annually. Given that the tea industry is Kenya’s largest agricultural foreign exchange earner and supports the livelihoods of millions of people, the impact of the ban extended far beyond the balance sheets of export houses.  

The immediate financial impact was felt most acutely by the smallholder farmers who form the backbone of the industry. The loss of a major buyer for premium grades would have exerted downward pressure on prices for those specific teas at the Mombasa auction, directly reducing farmer incomes. This strain on earnings was particularly acute in Kenya’s primary tea-growing counties, where the crop is a principal source of household income.  

The disruption rippled throughout the entire tea value chain. The sudden halt in shipments to Iran led to a significant pile-up of tea stocks in warehouses in Mombasa. This created a logistical bottleneck, increasing storage costs for exporters and straining the capacity of the warehousing sector, a critical component of the tea trade ecosystem. Exporters with existing contracts for the Sudanese market, another key destination, have faced similar disruptions due to political instability, with large volumes of branded and packed tea left stranded in Mombasa warehouses, illustrating the vulnerability of the logistics chain to sudden market closures. These events highlight how fluctuations and interruptions in export markets have a direct, tangible impact on the operational efficiency and profitability of Mombasa’s logistics and warehousing sector.  

III. The Path Forward: Diplomatic Resolution and a New Regulatory Horizon

Sub-section 3.1: Deconstructing the Joint Commission Agreement

The agreement to form a joint committee, reached during the 7th Session of the Kenya–Iran Joint Commission for Cooperation (JCC), represents a crucial diplomatic step towards normalizing trade relations. The committee’s mandate is clear and time-bound: within 60 days, it is tasked with developing and implementing a comprehensive framework to remove existing trade barriers, restore mutual trust, and enforce stringent quality standards to facilitate the resumption of tea exports.  

The significance of this agreement is underscored by the high level of political capital invested by both nations. The JCC was co-chaired by Kenya’s Prime Cabinet Secretary, Musalia Mudavadi, and Iran’s Minister of Agricultural Jihad, Dr. Gholamreza Nouri Ghezalcheh, with Kenya’s Agriculture Cabinet Secretary, Mutahi Kagwe, also playing a central role. This direct involvement of senior cabinet-level officials signals a strong and shared political will to resolve the impasse swiftly. Such a top-down approach suggests that the forthcoming regulations will be robust, carry the full weight of state authority, and be backed by a credible enforcement mechanism. This is not merely a technical adjustment but a strategic reset of the trade relationship, driven from the highest levels of government.  

Sub-section 3.2: Strengthening the Chain of Custody: The Imperative of Quality Assurance

At the heart of the diplomatic resolution is a mutual commitment to establishing a new, more rigorous quality assurance regime. Both governments have explicitly stated their intention to draft “stringent regulations” designed to safeguard the integrity of Kenyan tea and prevent a recurrence of fraudulent activities. For producers and exporters, this signals a fundamental shift towards a new era of heightened scrutiny, where compliance will be non-negotiable.  

It is anticipated that this new framework will be benchmarked against established international standards, most notably ISO 3720:2011, the global standard for black tea. This standard specifies key chemical requirements—such as minimum water extract (>32%), maximum total ash (4%−8%), and maximum crude fibre content (<16.5%)—that serve as indicators of good manufacturing practice. Adherence to these, and potentially other, quantifiable metrics will likely become a prerequisite for any tea destined for the Iranian market.  

The crisis has also exposed the critical need for enhanced traceability and verification throughout the supply chain. The ability of a fraudulent actor to introduce and co-mingle adulterated products highlights the limitations of existing systems. Consequently, the new regulations may mandate the adoption of more advanced traceability solutions. This could range from stricter enforcement of existing certifications like HACCP (Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point) and GMP (Good Manufacturing Practices) to the introduction of new technologies. There is a growing trend in the global tea quality control market towards leveraging digital platforms, and potentially even blockchain technology, to create an immutable, transparent record of a tea’s journey from the farm to the point of export. Such systems would provide buyers with verifiable proof of origin and quality, directly addressing the trust deficit created by the scandal.

While these new measures will undoubtedly increase the cost of compliance, they are a necessary investment to secure long-term access to high-value markets. This regulatory tightening could create a more tiered market, where larger, well-capitalized exporters who can readily invest in the required technology and certification processes may gain a competitive advantage over smaller players, potentially leading to a degree of market consolidation.  

Pillar/ObjectiveExpected Components and Implications
Restoring Trust– High-level diplomatic engagement and public commitment to resolving the issue. – Prosecution of fraudulent actors to demonstrate zero tolerance for malpractice. – Implication: Rebuilding the “Brand Kenya” reputation is the primary goal.
Enforcing Quality Standards– Mandatory adherence to international standards (e.g., ISO 3720). – Increased frequency and rigor of pre-shipment inspections and laboratory testing. – Joint verification protocols between Kenyan and Iranian authorities. – Implication: Higher operational costs and stricter compliance burdens for all exporters.
Traceability & Verification– Potential mandate for enhanced digital traceability systems from farm to port. – Stricter documentation requirements for proving the origin of all tea, including any used for blending. – Implication: Investment in new technologies and processes will be necessary to meet requirements.
Dispute Resolution– Establishment of a clear, bilateral mechanism for addressing future trade disputes or quality claims. – Implication: A more structured and predictable process for resolving issues, reducing the risk of sudden market closures.

Table 2: Key Pillars of the New Kenya-Iran Tea Trade Framework. This table synthesizes the objectives of the joint committee into their likely practical components and implications for market participants.  

Sub-section 3.3: Navigating External Headwinds: Geopolitical and Financial Risks

While the bilateral agreement between Kenya and Iran is a significant step forward, exporters must remain acutely aware of the complex geopolitical landscape that governs this trade corridor. The most significant and persistent challenge is the web of international, particularly U.S., sanctions imposed on Iran. These sanctions, while not typically targeting humanitarian goods like food, create formidable obstacles for financial transactions. Major international and Kenyan banks are often unwilling to handle payments originating from or destined for Iran due to the risk of incurring heavy penalties or being cut off from the U.S. financial system. This “de-risking” by financial institutions creates a major operational hurdle for exporters, who may face extreme difficulty in receiving payment through conventional channels. This payment challenge is a critical risk that could significantly slow the resumption of large-scale trade, even after the quality-related ban is formally lifted.  

This financial complexity may necessitate a strategic shift towards alternative settlement mechanisms. To circumvent the difficulties of USD-denominated transactions, the two countries might explore barter or counter-trade arrangements (e.g., exchanging Kenyan tea for Iranian oil, fertilizer, or other goods) or conduct trade using other currencies. While viable, these methods introduce new layers of complexity for exporters, including managing currency exchange risk, valuing goods for barter, and handling the logistics of counter-trade, all of which require specialized financial and legal expertise.

Furthermore, the broader geopolitical climate in the Middle East adds another layer of volatility. The ongoing tensions between Israel and Iran, as well as instability in key shipping lanes like the Red Sea and the Strait of Hormuz, pose a direct threat to supply chains. Conflict can lead to sudden spikes in shipping and insurance costs, lengthy transit delays due to rerouting, and the risk of outright disruption. The historical relationship between Kenya and Iran has also been inconsistent, often influenced by Kenya’s need to balance its trade interests with its strategic alliances with Western nations. This delicate diplomatic balancing act means that the long-term stability of the trade relationship is subject to external pressures beyond the control of individual exporters.  

IV. Market Outlook and Strategic Implications

Sub-section 4.1: Projected Impact on the Mombasa Tea Auction

The formal reopening of the Iranian market is poised to have a significant and largely positive impact on the dynamics of the Mombasa Tea Auction. The re-entry of a major international buyer will introduce a substantial new source of demand, particularly for the premium CTC and orthodox grades that the Iranian market favors. This demand-side shock is expected to create sustained upward pressure on the prices of these specific tea categories. Producers who have consistently maintained high-quality standards will be the primary beneficiaries of this price appreciation.  

The initial phase of market reopening may be characterized by a period of price volatility. As Iranian buyers look to rebuild their inventories and secure supply lines, competition for the limited available quantities of top-grade teas could become intense, leading to sharp price movements at the auction. This environment will reward producers of high-quality leaf but will present a challenge for buyers and blenders who must manage their procurement costs amid rising prices.

Beyond the direct price impact, the successful resolution of the trade impasse is expected to bolster overall market sentiment. The establishment of a more rigorous, internationally benchmarked quality control system for Kenyan tea sends a powerful message to the global market. This reinforced commitment to quality and integrity can enhance the reputation of “Brand Kenya” tea as a whole, potentially attracting new buyers and strengthening Kenya’s position in other key markets. This positive signal can foster greater confidence among all participants in the auction, contributing to a more stable and robust market environment in the long term.

Sub-section 4.2: Opportunities and Challenges for Producers and Exporters

For Kenyan tea producers and exporters, the resolution of the Iran issue presents a dual-sided scenario of significant opportunity coupled with formidable challenges. The primary opportunity lies in the potential for premiumization. The crisis has unequivocally demonstrated that quality is the cornerstone of access to high-value markets. This creates a clear commercial incentive for producers to invest in improving their agricultural and manufacturing practices, from green leaf handling at the farm level to processing standards at the factory. Those who successfully position themselves as reliable suppliers of high-quality, fully traceable tea will be best placed to command premium prices not only in Iran but across the global market.  

However, this opportunity is directly linked to the challenge of compliance. The anticipated new regulatory framework will establish a higher bar for all market participants. Exporters will need to navigate more stringent quality verification protocols, enhanced documentation requirements, and complex payment systems. The cost and operational capacity required to meet these new standards will be substantial. Failure to comply will no longer be an option; it will mean exclusion from a lucrative market.

This episode also serves as a critical lesson in the inherent risks of market concentration. While the reopening of the Iranian market is welcome, the disruption highlights the vulnerability that comes from over-reliance on a few key export destinations. The Tea Board of Kenya has been actively pursuing a strategy of market diversification, with a focus on developing new outlets in Eastern Europe, Asia, and other parts of the Middle East. It is imperative that producers and exporters align with this strategy, viewing the reopening of Iran not as a return to the status quo, but as one component of a broader, more resilient global market strategy.  

Sub-section 4.3: Actionable Insights for Market Participants – The Atlas View

In light of these developments, a proactive and strategic approach is essential for all stakeholders in the Kenyan tea value chain.

For Producers: The immediate priority must be an unwavering focus on quality. This is a crucial moment to conduct a comprehensive review of all production stages, from plucking standards and green leaf handling to factory processing and hygiene. The goal should be to ensure that current practices not only meet but demonstrably exceed the anticipated new regulatory benchmarks. Investing in process documentation and internal quality control systems will be critical for the verification and traceability that the new market environment will demand.

For Buyers and Importers: The re-entry of Iranian demand will increase competition for Kenya’s finest teas, likely leading to higher procurement costs. Securing a consistent supply of high-quality tea will hinge on forging strong, transparent relationships with reliable producers and their brokerage partners. A strategy of early engagement, clear quality specifications, and the development of long-term partnerships based on verified quality and mutual trust will be more effective than relying on spot-market transactions in what is expected to be a more competitive landscape.

For All Stakeholders: The new framework will require collective vigilance. The integrity of the Kenyan tea brand is a shared asset, and all parties—producers, brokers, exporters, and regulators—have a role to play in upholding the new standards and guarding against any attempts to circumvent them. In this evolving and more demanding market, partnering with a trusted, transparent broker is no longer just a transactional convenience but a strategic necessity. An experienced broker provides an essential layer of assurance, risk management, and market intelligence.

The renewed emphasis on stringent quality control for the Iranian market is likely to create a positive “halo effect” for Kenyan tea globally. As Kenya publicly overhauls and strengthens its quality assurance systems to satisfy a demanding partner, it inherently boosts the credibility and value proposition of its tea in all other export destinations, including the UK, Egypt, and Pakistan. Buyers in these markets, observing this enhanced commitment to integrity, may develop a greater preference for Kenyan tea, perceiving it as a more reliable and premium product. This could lead to increased demand and better price realization across the board. Furthermore, this crisis may serve as an important catalyst for accelerating modernization within the Kenyan tea sector. The pressing need for improved traceability could spur investment in digital supply chain platforms, while the focus on meeting the premium demands of the Iranian market may encourage more producers to transition from exporting bulk commodity tea to developing higher-margin, value-added products like packaged specialty and orthodox teas—a key strategic objective for the long-term health of the industry.  

V. The Atlas Perspective: Opportunity Tempered with Prudence

The diplomatic breakthrough between Kenya and Iran represents the most significant market development for the Kenyan tea sector in recent memory. The prospective reopening of a multi-billion shilling export market is an unequivocally positive event, offering a clear path to recover lost revenue, support farmer incomes, and reinforce Kenya’s global standing as a premier supplier of high-quality tea.

However, this opportunity must be viewed through a lens of strategic prudence. Access to the Iranian market is no longer guaranteed by historical preference alone; it is now conditional. The future of this trade relationship hinges on two critical factors: first, the successful design and rigorous implementation of a credible, transparent, and verifiable quality assurance framework that satisfies both parties; and second, the adept management of the persistent geopolitical and financial risks that lie outside the direct control of the tea industry.

The path forward demands a collective commitment to a higher standard. For producers, it requires an intensified focus on best practices at the farm and factory level. For exporters, it necessitates investment in compliance, traceability, and sophisticated risk management. For the industry as a whole, it calls for a renewed dedication to protecting the integrity of the “Brand Kenya” promise.

At Atlas Tea Brokers, we see this moment not as a return to the past, but as the beginning of a new era for the Kenyan tea trade—one defined by greater accountability and higher expectations. Our role in this new landscape is clear. With leadership that combines deep expertise in international relations and governance with decades of hands-on experience in the global tea trade, we are uniquely equipped to interpret the complex interplay of policy, politics, and market forces. Our comprehensive suite of services, from meticulous Quality Assessment to data-driven Market Intelligence, is designed to provide our clients with the clarity and confidence they need to navigate this environment.  

Our foundational values of Transparency, Trust, and Mutual Success are more relevant now than ever. We are committed to working alongside our producer and buyer partners to not only meet the new standards but to set a new benchmark for excellence. We believe that by embracing this challenge, the Kenyan tea industry can emerge stronger, more resilient, and with its global reputation enhanced. Atlas Tea Brokers stands ready to facilitate this transition, serving not just as a broker, but as a steadfast partner in building a more prosperous and reputable future for Kenyan tea.

References

Africa Check. (2024). Kenya tea industry performance report 2024. Africa Check.

African Marketing Confederation. (n.d.). Impressive export performance in 2024 by Kenya’s tea-growing sector. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://africanmarketingconfederation.org/impressive-export-performance-in-2024-by-kenyas-tea-growing-sector/

allAfrica.com. (n.d.-a). Kenya and Iran form joint committee to lift tea ban within 60 days. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://allafrica.com/stories/202402220456.html

allAfrica.com. (n.d.-b). U.S. sanctions hampering East Africa tea exports to Iran. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://allafrica.com/stories/201908200424.html

California Tea House. (n.d.). Are you drinking adulterated tea? Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://www.californiateahouse.com/are-you-drinking-adulterated-tea/

Citizen Digital. (n.d.). Kenya, Iran set 60-day timeline to end tea export ban. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://www.citizen.digital/news/kenya-iran-set-60-day-timeline-to-end-tea-export-ban-n337298

CityGreens. (n.d.). How to check for adulteration in tea leaves? Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://citygreens.ai/blogs/news/how-to-check-for-adulteration-in-tea-leaves

EBC. (n.d.). Kenya, Iran from the joint committee to lift the tea ban within 60 days. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://www.ebc.et/en/news/category/business/details/2024/02/22/22/33/kenya–iran-from-the-joint-committee-to-lift-the-tea-ban-within-60-days

Financial Fortune Media. (n.d.). Impact of the Middle East crisis on East Africa’s supply chain. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://financialfortunemedia.com/impact-of-the-middle-east-crisis-on-east-africas-supply-chain/

FirsdTea. (n.d.). Tea quality and safety certifications – What you need to know. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://blog.firsdtea.com/tea-quality-and-safety-certifications-what-you-need-to-know/

Food Business Africa. (n.d.). Cost of tea export surges as shipping delays hit Mombasa port. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://www.foodbusinessafrica.com/cost-of-tea-export-surges-as-shipping-delays-hit-mombasa-port/

IDN-InDepthNews. (n.d.). Iran deal brings bonus for Kenyan tea planters. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://indepthnews.net/index.php/global-governance/un-insider/2453-iran-deal-brings-bonus-for-kenyan-tea-planters

International Agency for Research on Cancer. (n.d.). Tea. IARC Publications. https://publications.iarc.who.int/59

International Organization for Standardization. (2011). Black tea — Definition and basic requirements (ISO Standard No. 3720:2011). https://www.intertekinform.com/standards/ihs/iso/3720-2011.html

Interos. (n.d.). Global choke points: Supply chain fallout from the Israel-Iran conflict. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://www.interos.ai/global-choke-points-supply-chain-fallout-from-the-israel-iran-conflict/

JapaneseGreenTeaIn.com. (n.d.). Ensuring food safety in tea production: Best practices. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://www.japanesegreenteain.com/blogs/green-tea-and-health/ensuring-food-safety-in-tea-production-best-practices

KBC Digital. (n.d.). Kenya and Iran form joint committee to lift tea ban within 60 days. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://www.kbc.co.ke/kenya-and-iran-form-joint-committee-to-lift-tea-ban-within-60-days/

Kenya Revenue Authority. (n.d.). Court orders for 100% verification of 82 forty-foot containers with imported cargo declared as imported tea. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://www.kra.go.ke/en/media-center/press-release/591-court-orders-for-100-verification-of-82-forty-foot-containers-with-imported-cargo-declared-as-imported-tea

Kenyan Foreign Policy. (n.d.). On-and-off relations between Nairobi and Tehran. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://kenyanforeignpolicy.com/on-and-off-relations-between-nairobi-and-tehran/

Kenyans.co.ke. (n.d.-a). Kenya, Iran in talks to lift ban on tea exports within 60 days. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://www.kenyans.co.ke/news/97891-kenya-iran-talks-lift-ban-tea-exports-within-60-days

Kenyans.co.ke. (n.d.-b). Tea exporters warn of massive losses after Sudan ban, urge Ruto to act. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://www.kenyans.co.ke/news/88719-tea-exporters-warn-massive-losses-after-sudan-ban-urge-ruto-act

Kenyan Wallstreet. (n.d.). Kenya, Iran to resolve tea export ban in 60 days after quality scandal. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://kenyanwallstreet.com/kenya-iran-to-resolve-tea-export-ban-in-60-days/

Lifeasible. (n.d.). Tea adulteration testing. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://www.lifeasible.com/custom-solutions/food-and-feed/food-testing-services/food-adulteration-testing/tea-adulteration-testing/

MarketResearch.com. (n.d.). Global tea quality control service market research report 2025 (Status and Outlook). Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://www.marketresearch.com/Infiniti-Research-Limited-v2680/Global-Tea-Quality-Control-Service-12248906/

Munyao, E. M., Muthama, C., & Kashindi, N. (2024). Revised regulatory impact assessment (RIA) report tea (tea levy) regulations, 2024. Tea Board of Kenya. https://teaboard.or.ke/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/REVISED-RIA-REPORT-ON-TEA-LEVY-REGULATIONS-2024.pdf

Ngeno, V. (n.d.). A value chain approach to stakeholders analysis and management of tea trade in Kenya. University of Nairobi Digital Repository. http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/7645

ResearchGate. (n.d.). (PDF) Developing local processing technology for black and green tea and evaluation of conformance to ISO standard. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336214878_Developing_local_processing_technology_for_black_and_green_tea_and_evaluation_of_conformance_to_ISO_standard

Shahidi, M. A. (n.d.). 2023 Iranian tea smuggling scandal. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://miralishahidi.ir/blog/2023-iranian-tea-smuggling-scandal.html

Shan Teas. (n.d.). Quality standards & compliances. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://shanteas.com/quality-standards-compliances/

Smart Farmer Africa. (n.d.). Kenya, Iran forms joint committee to lift tea export ban in 60 days. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://smartfarmerkenya.com/kenya-iran-forms-joint-committee-to-lift-tea-export-ban-in-60-days/

The Standard. (n.d.-a). Kenya, Iran move to lift tea export ban within 60 days. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://www.standardmedia.co.ke/business/business/article/2001490217/kenya-iran-move-to-lift-tea-export-ban-within-60-days

The Standard. (n.d.-b). Pact paves way for resumption of tea exports to Iran. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://www.standardmedia.co.ke/business/article/2001484179/pact-paves-way-for-resumption-of-tea-exports-to-iran

The Star. (n.d.-a). Blow to tea farmers as Iran envoy warns war with Israel to prolong talks on lifting exports ban. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://www.the-star.co.ke/news/2024-04-18-blow-to-tea-farmers-as-iran-envoy-warns-war-with-israel-to-prolong-talks-on-lifting-exports-ban/

The Star. (n.d.-b). Kenya, Iran form joint committee to lift ban on tea exports. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://www.the-star.co.ke/business/kenya/2024-02-22-kenya-iran-form-joint-committee-to-lift-ban-on-tea-exports/

The Star. (n.d.-c). State cancels tea trader’s license over Iran deal concerns. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://www.the-star.co.ke/business/kenya/2023-08-01-state-cancels-tea-traders-license-over-iran-deal-concerns/

Tea Board of Kenya. (2024). Kenya tea industry performance highlights for 2023. https://teaboard.or.ke/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/TEA-INDUSTRY-PERFORMANCE-FOR-THE-YEAR-2023.pdf

The Kenyan Diaspora. (n.d.). Kenya and Iran strengthen tea trade ties with new joint committee. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://thekenyandiaspora.com/kenya-and-iran-strengthen-tea-trade-ties-with-new-joint-committee/

TradeMark Africa. (n.d.). East Africa tea sales to post-sanctions Iran could jump more than fivefold. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://www.trademarkafrica.com/news/east-africa-tea-sales-to-post-sanctions-iran-could-jump-more-than-fivefold/

Trading Economics. (2025). Kenya exports of tea to Iran. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://tradingeconomics.com/kenya/exports/iran/tea

WeeTracker. (n.d.). Why American sanctions on Iran are crashing Kenya’s tea party. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://weetracker.com/2019/08/21/why-american-sanctions-on-iran-are-crashing-kenyas-tea-party/

Wikipedia. (n.d.-a). Iran–Kenya relations. In Wikipedia. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Kenya_relations

Wikipedia. (n.d.-b). Kenya. In Wikipedia. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya

World Tea News. (n.d.-a). Iran sanctions hurt Kenya’s tea industry. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://www.worldteanews.com/tea-industry-news-and-features/iran-sanctions-hurt-kenyas-tea-industry

World Tea News. (n.d.-b). U.S. sanctions on Iran negatively impact tea trade. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://www.worldteanews.com/Insights/us-sanctions-iran-negatively-impact-tea-trade

YouTube. (n.d.-a). HOPE FOR TEA FARMERS AS KENYA AND IRAN FORMS JOINT COMMITTEE TO LIFT TEA BAN WITHIN SIXTY DAYS. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9_W_1o7q8s

YouTube. (n.d.-b). Kenya and Iran move to restore tea trade. Tea export ban lifted after diplomatic breakthrough. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XlZ_f_4j_2g

YouTube. (n.d.-c). Kenya and Iran to lift ban after new trade deal. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_k_7hF6e8k

YouTube. (n.d.-d). Kenya and Iran to strengthen bilateral relations and eliminate trade impediments. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_x5gC7f6_M

YouTube. (n.d.-e). Kenya and Iran form joint committee to ease trade barriers, aiming to lift Kenyan tea ban in 60 days. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0_n_h_3d_1k

Zawya. (n.d.). Israel-Iran war: Kenya tea exporters caught in the crosscurrents. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://www.zawya.com/en/economy/africa/israel-iran-war-kenya-tea-exporters-caught-in-the-crosscurrents-mbf13184